Organizational silos might be necessary–but the problems they create aren’t. Find out how much value you’re losing to “tower vision” inside.
Silos are necessary in companies. They provide the structure that allows companies to work. Every company is split into divisions, departments, or groups, such as sales, technology, and finance. This structure allows expertise in different areas. In companies, silos tend to be places where information, focus (another word for choosing priorities), and control flow up and down. But company silos also cause problems–that same structure prevents the flow of information, focus, and control outward. And in order for a company to work efficiently, decisions need to be made across silos.
There are three aspects to the organizational silos barrier:
• Nonaligned priorities
• Lack of information flow
• Lack of coordinated decision making across silos
Silos occur naturally because of the way organizations are structured. Each part of a company reports up to a manager who has responsibility only for that part of the company. But none of the parts is truly independent. Each relies on others to perform its function, and the company performs well only when each of these sometimes many parts or units work closely together.
This kind of company structure is also necessary because it keeps accountability and responsibility in the silo. It also fosters a sense of independence and pride of ownership, which is a good thing. Senior management’s role is to look broadly at the organization; a department manager’s is to look deeply into his or her own area. The problem is, doing this creates what I call “tower vision.” Managers tend to look up and down only within their own silos–never looking around or across–so all they see, and tend to think about, is their own silo. They don’t know what is happening elsewhere in the organization or how their actions impact other areas. They act primarily in the interest of their own silo.
This makes sense. After all, when you are a division manager, your priorities naturally and appropriately center on your division. You may not even be thinking about other groups. And when you have to make decisions that may affect other silos, you are conditioned to think about your own silo first.
Just because a course of action makes sense for a silo manager doesn’t mean it is the best way to do things or even in the best interests of the entire company. From a company point of view, silos need to work together. But too often that doesn’t happen. Problems arise when departments do not share the same priorities, knowledge, or information, and when managers work in an independent, entrepreneurial manner–in short, when people are operating with tower vision.
You see the organizational silo at work all the time. Every manager is part of a silo and has been frustrated when his or her priorities did not align with someone else’s in a different department. (Can you remember telling a colleague that whatever you needed was really important? Or telling another colleague that you were doing something that has a higher priority? We have all been on both sides of the equation.)
Customers also see the organizational silo barrier at work. Think about the process of buying a new car. The salesman at the dealership sells you a car but has to rely on a computer system to tell you if it is in stock. The dealership’s sales department is run by a sales manager, who has no control over how the computer system works. She relies on another unit to keep technology running smoothly.
The salesman also needs to know how quickly he can get the car to you. This is also not in his manager’s control. Even if the auto manufacturer actually has a car in stock in the color and with all the features that you want, and even if the computer inventory program is accurate, it is up to the distribution department, under the control of yet another manager, to get the car to you. And if you want to finance the car, that is yet another department–and another department the salesman and his manager have no control over. It is only when all of these units within the dealership operate successfully together that the salesman is able to make you happy with the purchase of your new car.
Breaking The Barrier
To break the organizational silos barrier, the goal is not to destroy silos themselves but to eliminate the problems that silos cause. That is a critical distinction. Managers may be tempted to think that getting rid of silos is the answer. But the structure that silos bring is very important in terms of creating accountability and responsibility within the organization. Silo managers know clearly what they are responsible for. Cooperation, communication, and collaboration are the three keys to working across silos. Those are components that ideally any successful working relationship would have, but they are must-havesif you are going to break the organizational silos barrier.
You can break this barrier when knowledge, focus, and control are shared among more than one silo. The solution is about losing tower vision and being able to look at–and see–things from a different person’s or department’s point of view.
Breaking this barrier is also not about proving who is “wrong” and who is “right.” It is perfectly understandable why silo heads have different priorities and why they believe that they are doing the best thing for the company when they are doing the best thing for their silo. When managers have been given responsibility and authority, it is only natural that they will choose to exercise them–and not always in moderation. When decisions to reprioritize do get made, it is because collaboration or communication has allowed a shift in perspective.
Human nature forces people to want to do the best they can within their own “sandbox” at the expense of everybody else. “Owning” a function or a part of a business naturally brings forth a manager’s entrepreneurial spirit, and you don’t get to be head of a silo without being competitive. Managers rationalize their lack of cooperation as “I’ve been given this area to run as I see fit and I need to do the best job I possibly can.”
This is easier said than done, of course. We are, after all, in typical silo heads talking about a group of very focused, highly competitive individuals. A good process to remove barriers highlights where cooperation is not occurring, and it points out the consequences of those lapses. It puts in place measures to ensure that decisions are not made in isolation going forward.
These five questions will help you understand your organization’s siloing–and move beyond it:
- What priorities do you or your department have that are not aligned with another’s?
- Put yourself in the place of the other silo–what would make that silo realize that your need was a priority?
- What information do you or your department have that could be useful to others?
- What information or assistance do you need from another silo that you are not getting?
- In what areas would increased collaboration and giving up some autonomy be more beneficial for the company than maintaining your individuality?
Original article page can be found at: https://www.fastcompany.com/1839317/build-your-business-smash-your-silos
Excerpted from How Excellent Companies Avoid Dumb Things by Neil Smith with Patricia O’Connell. Copyright © 2012 by the author and reprinted by permission of Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
The article discusses the necessity of organizational silos in companies while also acknowledging the issues they can create. Silos, defined as divisions, departments, or groups within an organization like sales, technology, and finance, offer expertise in different areas. They also encourage accountability and foster a sense of independence and pride of ownership. However, they may hinder the free flow of information and decision-making across the organization due to nonaligned priorities, lack of information flow, and lack of coordinated decision-making. This limitation can lead to a phenomenon known as “tower vision,” where managers within silos are primarily concerned with their own divisions and do not consider the impact of their actions on other parts of the organization.
This is where LEAD.bot comes into play. It stimulates the dissemination of information and fosters cooperation between silos, thereby mitigating the issues caused by silos. The aim is not to dismantle the silos but rather to enable communication, collaboration, and cooperation across these divisions. LEAD.bot can automate regular check-ins and feedback collection, nurture positive communication practices, provide bias checks, and endorse accountability. In doing so, it aids in dismantling the barriers erected by silos, promoting a more unified and efficient organization.
Furthermore, in scenarios such as mergers and acquisitions, LEAD.bot creates simple coffee meetups that proves indispensable by easing communication and fostering understanding across merging entities, helping to create common ground. It also enhances employee engagement through its various features that facilitate dialogue, provide micro-lessons, and allow feedback. This culminates in an environment where employees feel valued, understood, and part of a unified team, reducing the isolation felt within individual silos.
For employee engagement, LEAD.bot empowers managers to consider situations from diverse perspectives and make decisions that align with the broader organizational interests, not just those of their own division. This contributes significantly to organizational effectiveness by breaking down silo barriers and fostering a more integrated and collaborative work environment.
Add LEAD.bot to Slack or Microsoft Teams, and you will see positive changes in your company shortly. Talk to us today to find out how!